By Angus Thompson in the The Sydney Morning Herald
The leader of a major church group says it is disingenuous to portray Australian Christians as victims of persecution in his criticism of a NSW religious freedom bill spurred by the Israel Folau controversy.
In comments made before his appearance in a parliamentary committee to discuss One Nation’s Mark Latham’s proposed legislation on Friday, Uniting Church NSW and ACT Synod moderator Simon Hansford put himself at odds with other denominations and the schools under its umbrella in slamming the bill as heavy-handed against minorities.
Reverend Hansford rejected claims that discrimination against Christians was spiralling in Australian society, saying instead the evidence showed most discrimination was directed towards religious minorities.
“Christians are not victims in Australia because of our faith, and we should not seek freedoms that are self-serving and come at the detriment of others in the community,” he said.
“We strongly urge that any such provisions to protect Christian freedoms, must in no way diminish mutual respect, freedom from discrimination and enjoyment of the human rights of everyone in NSW.
“It is disingenuous to portray Australian’s Christians as victims of persecutions and to bolster their religious freedoms to the detriment of our diverse religious communities, many of which are subject to discrimination, some of which is unconscious and some, sadly, deliberate.”
Reverend Hansford’s comments butt against Mr Latham’s assertion in his speech introducing the bill to Parliament earlier this year, during which he said, “the fastest growing form of discrimination in our society is against people of religious faith, especially Christians”.
The “Christian Right” is a politically active group that people should be concerned about.
The arguments the likes of Latham makes. Don’t ppear to be made in the interests of Christians. More to satisfy the political desires of some within the Church.
The everyday parishioners all to trusting of their motives and all to willing to follow their directions.
There should be no ‘special needs’. Everyone should be protected as equals under the same citizen laws
While l acknowledge the right to belong to a religion, it does not mean that l respect those beliefs. Therefore the many benefits accorded to these groups is I think totally unfounded and their strange ideas should not affect our laws and freedoms. Let them keep their ideas within their churches/mosques/kingdom halls etc etc and etc. There are so many. And of course, they all believe that their ‘truth’ is the only truth.